page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100

ll October - December 2008 lime 59 the future, we asked The Times' cricket correspondent Geoffrey Dean ( in consultation with Tony Cozier) the question: if everyone was playing now, at their peak, who would make the All- Time First XI? ILLUSTRATION: WWW. PHILDISLEY. COM

T o be given the task of picking a greatest West Indies team of all time induced both pleasure and angst. A mere glance at those on a shortlist brought back joyful memories of so many great players, but pruning them into a final eleven ( with a twelfth man) was a devilishly difficult challenge. As an English cricket writer, I can at least claim to be impartial, but having travelled extensively through the Caribbean I know full well that opinion will be divided and sensibilities tested. One leading authority on West Indies cricket even described the very selection of an all- time eleven as an exercise in futility. But, futile or not, this was the brief. W ith an all- rounder at number six ' Garfield Sobers' name being the first on the team sheet - and a wicketkeeper at seven, that left five spaces for specialist batsmen and four for bowlers. Starting with the former, it was quickly clear that the claims of an array of extraordinarily talented middle order players meant one might have to open the batting. If Vivian Richards, the most feared batsman of his generation, was next on the team sheet, and had to be followed by Brian Lara, the second- highest run scorer in the history of Test cricket, that buttoned up numbers three and four with the pair inter- changeable in the batting order. That left only one more middle order place at number five, with a whole host of candidates... George Headley, Clyde Walcott, Everton Weekes, Frank Worrell, Clive Lloyd, Rohan Kanhai, Richie Richardson and Shivnarine Chanderpaul to name but a few. One obvious solution was to give Walcott the wicketkeeping gloves, a role he performed with some distinction for 15 of his 44 Tests, even if Jeffrey Dujon, a veteran of 79 appearances and himself a fine batsman, was a more athletic option keeping to the fast bowlers. Walcott was nevertheless more assured standing up, and with two spinners in CRICKET 60 lime October - December 2008 my side, that was an important consideration. Moreover, Walcott's superiority as a batsman - he once made five hundreds in one series against Australia in 1954- 5 when he totalled a remarkable 827 runs - made him impossible to leave out. With a Test average of 58, you could argue he is too low at number seven in the order, but he would be formidable ' insurance' - a modern- day Adam Gilchrist. For a long time, George Headley was considered the best batsman to have come out of the Caribbean, and his Test average of ll